The Influence of Modeling Techniques and Motivation Learning against Writing Skills of Student News Text of Class VIII SMP Negeri 3 Padang

Novritika Novritika(1*), Harris Effendi Thahar(2), Irfani Basri(3)
  • (1) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (3) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

This study aims to describe the influence of modeling techniques and learning motivation to the news text writing skills of students. This research used quantitative with the 2x2 factorial experimental design. The Sample in this research is 60 students. The instruments used motivation inventory to learn and performance inventory. The results from this study are: First, there are differences among the results of text-writing skills taught by modeling techniques with the results of text-writing skills taught by conventional techniques. Secondly, there are differences as the result of writing skill of news text of students who have high learning motivation with students who have low learning motivation. The result of writing skill of news text of students who have higher learning motivation is higher than students who have low learning motivation. Third, there is no interaction between modeling techniques and learning motivation in influencing the ability to write news text.

Keywords

modeling techniques, learning motivation, skill writing news text

References

  1. Allen, M. J., dan Yen, W. M. (1979). Introduction to Measurement Theory. California: Brooks/Cole Publishing Company.
  2. Andheska, H. (2016). “Membangun motivasi belajar siswa dalam pembelajaran menulis dengan memanfaatkan media pembelajaran inovatif”. Program Studi Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia, Universitas Maritim Raja Ali Haji. Bahastra, Oktober 2016, Volume XXXVI, Nomor 1.
  3. Baer, J., Baldi, S., Ayotte, K., & Green, P. J. (2007). “The reading literacy of US fourth-grade students in an international context: results from the 2001 and 2006 progress in international reading literacy study (PIRLS).” Washington, DC: National Center for Education Statistics, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.
  4. Barton, D., Hamilton, M., & Ivanic, R. (2000). Situated Literacy, Reading and Writing in Context. London: Rotlegde.
  5. Brady, E. R. (1972). The Effectiveness of Field Trips Compared to Media in Teaching Selected Environmental Concepts. USA: Iowa State University.
  6. Burks, C.G. (2005). “Combating the bartleby syndrome with synectics: examining teacher attitude and the influences on student writing”. Dissertation, Houston: Faculty of The College of Education, University of Houston.
  7. Deshpande, S. (2014). “Teaching writing skills in English: involvement of students in the assessment and correction of their own errors”. International Journal of English Language Teaching, Vol.3, No.1, pp. 68-73, March 2014.
  8. Elly, W. B. (1992). How in The World do Students Read, IEA Study of Reading Literacy. Hamburg: The International Association for the Evaluation of Education Achivement.
  9. Fernandes. A. S. (2012). “Writing to learn writing skills – a case study”. European Journal of Engineering Education, Vol. 37, No. 2, May 2012, 179–192.
  10. Gendrop, S. C. (1996). “Effect on intervention in synectics on the creative thinking of nurse.” Creativity Research Journal, 9, 1, 11-19.
  11. Gould, E. et al. (1989). The Educated Child. New York: The Free Press.
  12. Graham, S., Bollinger, A., Olson, C. B., D’Aoust, C., McCutchen, D., & Olinghouse, N. (2012). “Teaching Elementary School Students to be Effective Writers: a Practice Guide”. NCEE 2012-4058. What Works Clearinghouse.
  13. Irianto, A. (2004). Statistik Konsep Dasar dan Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Perdana Media.
  14. Joni, T. R. (1992). “Memicu perbaikan pendidikan melalui kurikulum”. Basis, No.07-08, 49, 41-48.
  15. Kilgour, M. (2006). “Improving the creative process: analysis of the effect of divergent thinking techniques and domain specific knowledge on creativity”. International Journal of Business and Society, 7, 2, 79-107.
  16. Kotseas., E., & Hashemi, R. (2017). “Asian students’ challenges in writing with confidence”. NYS TESOL JOURNAL, Vol. 4, No. 2 July 2017.
  17. Lavie Alon, N., & Tal, T. (2015). “Student self-reported learning outcomes of field trips: The pedagogical impact”. International Journal of Science Education, 37(8), 1279-1298.
  18. Lie, A. (2004). Cooperative Learning, Memperaktikkan Cooperative Learning di Ruang-ruang Kelas. Jakarta: Gramedia.
  19. Mattisson Ekstam, J. (2015). “Cultural and academic meetings in the writing classroom: China and the West”. Sino-US English Teaching, April 2015, Vol. 12, No. 4, 241-249.
  20. Munandar, U. (2004). Pengembangan Motivasi belajar Anak Berbakat. Jakarta: Asdi Mahasatya.
  21. Nawi, N. F. dan Azmi, A. F. (2016). “An assessment of the effectiveness of field trips as a teaching and learning strategy: a case study of field trip to the parliament”. Journal of Academia UiTM Negeri Sembilan 4 (2016) 1-11.
  22. Negari, G. M. (2011). A study on strategy instruction and EFL learners’ writing skill. International Journal of English Linguistics, 1(2), 299.
  23. Rababah, L. M., Mohamed, A. H. B., Jdaitawi, M. T., & Melhem, N. Z. B. (2013). “The level of creativity in english writing among jordanian secondary school students”. Arts and Design Studies www.iiste.org ISSN 2224-6061 (Paper) ISSN 2225-059X (Online) Vol.10, 2013.
  24. Rahmawati, D.L. (2013). “Penerapan teknik karyawisata dalam pembelajaran menulis karya sastra (berita)”. Tenaga Pengajar pada Program Studi PGSD FKIP Universitas Muhammadiyah Palangkaraya Anterior Jurnal, Volume 13 Nomor 1, Desember 2013, Hal 43 – 51.
  25. Republika. (2014). Keterampilan menulis siswa Indonesia rendah, (Online), (http://republika.com, diakses 10 September 2017).
  26. Sugiyono. (2012). Teknik Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  27. Supriadi, D. (1994). Motivasi belajar, Kebudayaan, dan Perkembangan IPTEK. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  28. Supriyoko. (2004). Kebangkitan pendidikan kita. Kedaulatan Rakyat, 26 Mei 2004, hlm. 12.
  29. Suryabrata, S. (2011). Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.
  30. Suwanda. (2011). Desain Eksperimen untuk Penelitian Ilmiah. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  31. Teo, T. dan Tan, A. (2006). “The use of Biyu in students creative writing: a study on an intervention program”. The Korean Journal of Creative Thinking, 3, 1, 30-39.
  32. Winskel, H. (2013). “Reading and writing in Southeast Asian languages”. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 97 ( 2013 ) 437 – 442.
  33. Zulaikhoh, S. (2009). Penerapan teknik field trip untuk meningkatkan kemampuan menulis deskripsi pada siswa kelas X-1 SMA Negeri 1 Ngemplak Kabupaten Boyolali. Skripsi. Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Sastra Indonesia dan Daerah, Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan, Universitas Muhammadiyah Surakarta.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/20181104

International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology

International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP

978-989-758-296-7

978-602-73537-9-4

April 2018

  View Articles

© 2023 GCI, Global Conferences Index, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.