Developing research based learning to increase students’ entrepreneurial interest


The aim of research was to develop research-based learning models to increase students’ entrepreneurial interest in State University of Padang. It was begun by doing the related surveys for current situation of entrepreneurial teachingdid not provide yetthe knowledge and students’ entrepreneurial expectations. For that reason need a research-based learning to empower student’s strategy in the field of real business as well as to improve students’ self-evaluation in enhancing their ability to take the business opportunity as the manifestation of the entrepreneurship course. This research used research and development method with Triangulation Mixed Method Design. Updating of the models was done by doing the curriculum assessment with specialists and practitioners. The collection of the data used questionnaires, interviews, documentary studies, training and mentoring as well as Focus Group Discussion (FGD). Quantitative data were analyzed by using an experimental model by using independent t-test. The experimental results on the three classes showed that research-based learning models can give positive impact to students’ entrepreneurial interest and this model had qualified and allowable to be used as teaching materials for entrepreneurship courses at the Education Faculty of State University of Padang.The developed model was expected become a feasible choice by entrepreneurshiplecturers to the implementation of entrepreneurship course for university students at faculty of Education in State University of Padang.


Research Based Learning, Student. Entrepreneurship


  1. Beckman, M., & Hensel, N. (2009). Making Explicit the Implicit: Defining Undergraduate Research. CUR Quarterly, 29(4), 40–44.
  2. Blackmore, P., & Cousin, G. (2003). Linking teaching and research through research-based learning. Educational Developments, 4, 24–27.
  3. Brew, A. (2001). Conceptions of Research: A phenomenographic study. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 271–285.
  4. Brew, A. (2010). From the International Desk. An Australian Perspective on Undergraduate Research. Quarterly, 37–42.
  5. Brew, A., & Jewell, E. (2012). Enhancing quality learning through experiences of research-based learning: Implications for academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 17(1), 47–58.
  6. Creswell W John. (2014). Research Design, Qualitative, Quantitative and Mixed Methods Approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publication, Inc.
  7. Dekker, H., & Wolff, S. W. (2016). Re-inventing Research-Based Teaching and Learning Paper prepared for presentation at the meeting of the European Forum for Enhanced Collaboration in Teaching of the European University Association in Brussels on 5 December 2016, (December).
  8. Feiman-Nemser, S. (2001). From preparation to practice: Designing a continuum to strengthen and sustain teaching. Teachers College Record, 103(6), 1013–1055.
  9. Healey, M., Jordan, F., Pell, B., & Short, C. (2010). The research-teaching nexus: A case study of students’ awareness, experiences and perceptions of research. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(2), 235–246.
  10. Kuh, G. D. (2008). High-impact educational practices: What they are, who has access to them, and why they matter. Washington, DC: Association of American Colleges and Universities.
  11. Lambert, C. (2009). Pedagogies of participation in higher education: A case for researchbased learning. Pedagogy, Culture and Society, 17(3), 295–309.
  12. Levy, P., & Petrulis, R. (2012). How do first-year university students experience inquiry and research, and what are the implications for the practice of inquiry-based learning? Studies in Higher Education, 37(1), 85–101.
  13. Seymour, E., Hunter, A. B., Laursen, S. L., & Deantoni, T. (2004). Establishing the benefits of research experiences for undergraduates in the sciences: First findings from a three-year study. Science Education, 88(4), 493–534.
  14. Shin, J. C. (2011). Teaching and research nexuses across faculty career stage, ability and affiliated discipline in a South Korean research university. Studies in Higher Education, 36(4), 485–503.
  15. Simons, M., & Elen, J. (2007). The “research-teaching nexus” and “education through research”: An exploration of ambivalences. Studies in Higher Education, 32(5), 617–631.
  16. Smith, P., & Rust, C. (2011). The potential of research-based learning for the creation of truly inclusive academic communities of practice. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 48(2), 115–125.
  17. Thiagarajan, S., Semmel, D. S., & Semmel, M. I. (2010). Instructional Development for Training Teachers of Exceptional Children: A Sourcebook. Center for Innovation in Teaching the Handicapped. Indiana: Indiana University Bloomington.