The development of reading comprehension learning material by SQ4R strategy for grade iv at primary schools


Teachers have responsibility to create and develop an effective learning material in order to facilitate the student to understand the reading content optimally. There are, it is important to develop an effective learning material by using SQ4R strategy as the solution The type of this research is R&D by using 4-D model. The sample were 42 students and 2 teachers in primary school. The result of the research indicated that the validity rate of the learning material is valid. Then upon the assessment on the implementation of lesson plan, the responses from teachers and learning participants and the observations on teaching materials indicated that the practicality rate fell to the category of highly practical. Moreover, the result of the activity of learning participants on reading comprehension indicated to be effective. Hence, it could be concluded that the developed reading comprehension learning material by using SQ4R strategy has already been valid, practical, and effective.


learning material, reading comprehension, SQ4R strategy, 4-D models.


  1. Abbas, S. (2006). Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia yang Efektif di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: Depdiknas
  2. Abidin, Y. (2012). Pembelajaran Bahasa Berbasis Pendidikan Karakter. Bandung: Refika Aditama
  3. Alaa, B, K. (2016). The Impact of Using Jigsaw Strategy on Improving Reading Comprehension and Communication Skillsamong Eleventh Graders in Rafah. Eric Doc.
  4. Barth, A. E, S., & Mcculley, E, V. (2015). The effects of blended text-processing and linguistic comprehension interventions among struggling middle-school readers. International Journal for Research in Learning Disabilities, 2(2), 2-17.
  5. Basar, M. (2017).Effect of the SQ4R Technique on the Reading Comprehension ofElementary School 4th Grade Elementary School Student. Eric Doc
  6. Erdal, P, & Ali, E. (2016). Improving Reading Comprehension Skills Throughthe SCRATCH ProgramInternational Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(1), 124-150.
  7. İbrahim, Y & Selcuk B, D. (2017). Examination of the Relation between TEOG Score of Turkish Revolution History and Kemalism Course and Reading Comprehension Skill (An Example of Explanatory Sequential Mixed Design). Journal of Education and Practice. 34 (7).
  8. Gulhiz, P. (2016). The Evaluation of Effectiveness of Reciprocal Teaching Strategies on Comprehension of Expository Texts. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 4 (10).
  9. Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Pustaka Setia.
  10. Hacer, U & Hayati, A. (2016). The Effects of Repetitive Reading and PQRS Strategyinthe Development of Reading Skill. Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 63, 225-242
  11. Hairul, N, I, Mohammad, R, A & Abbas, P, G. (2012). The role of SQ4R strategy as an important factor of improving reading motivation. Malaysian Journal of Education Technology, Eric Doc.
  12. Hugh W, C & Alan G, K. (2017). Reading Comprehension Is Not a Single Ability. Eric Doc.
  13. Jonathan, A. (2013). Reading Journal: Its Benefits for Extensive Reading. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 12 (3). 1-8.
  14. Joel, C, M. (206). Metacognitive Reading Strategies, Motivation, and Reading Comprehension Performance of Saudi EFL Students. Journal Eanglish Language. 9 (3).
  15. Joseph L, M, Sheila A, M, Jennifer C, & Christina R. (2015). The Effects of Self Questioning on Reading Comprehension: A Literature Review. Eric Doc
  16. Kemendiknas. (2010). Petunjuk Teknis Pengembangan Bahan Ajar SMA. Jakarta: Kemendiknas, Direktorat Jenderal Manajemen Pendidikan Dasar dan Menengah
  17. Mercedes, S, Jamie, M, Q, & Richard, K, W. (2014). Specific Reading Comprehension Disability: Major Problem, Myth, or Misnomer?. Journal of Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 29(1), 3–9
  18. Mustafa, K. (2016). An exploratory study of the relationships betweenreading comprehension competence, readingattitude and the vividness of mental imagery amongTurkish fourth-grade students. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 8(4), 675-686.
  19. Narges, S, S, V, & Farh L, K. (2015). Effectiveness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies and SQ4R Methods in Reducing Test Anxiety In Students. International Journal of Fudamental Psychology and Social Science. 5 (4). 41-45
  20. Nurul, L, K . & Ninuk L. (2017).Improving English Reading Comprehension Ability through Survey, Questions, Read, Record, Recite, Review Strategy (SQ4R). Journal Eanglish Language Teaching. 10 (12). 1-10
  21. Rahim, F. (2012). Pengajaran Membaca di Sekolah Dasa.
  22. Seher, B. (2017). Reading Comprehension Skills OfBilingual Children In Turkey. European Journal of Education Studies. 3 (6).
  23. Santos, L, Ximena, C, Luis, O, & Francisca, L. (2015). Automated formative evaluations for readingcomprehension in an English as a foreign languagecourse: benefits on performance, user satisfaction,and monitoring of higher education students in Chile. Eric Doc.
  24. Samuel, S. (2010). Is There A Correlation Between The Use Of Accelerated Reader In The Classroom And Student Achievement In Reading Comprehension?. Eric Doc.
  25. Shahri, N. 2015. Effectiveness of Cognitive and Metacognitive Strategies and SQ4R Methods in Reducing Test Anxiety In Student. Eric Doc