Development model history learning based on character in student students in the city of Padangsidimpuan

Abstract

The objectives of this research are (1) To describe the development of character-based history learning to focus on exemplary on religious components, honest and homeland love for high school students in Kota Padangsidimpuan, (2) to design the development of character-based history learning on religious components, honest and homeland love for high school students covering Knowing the validity, effectiveness and practicality of the development of character-based history learning for high school students in accordance with the values of religious character, honest and love the homeland. Research design is Research and Development using ADDIE model. This research was conducted by SMA Negeri Padang Sidimpuan. The subject of product trial involves 30 students by implementing pretest-postest through the result of questionnaire of character-based history learning Data collecting technique in the form of questionnaire, interview, observation and test. Data analysis technique description. The results of research illustrate that the character-based history learning model such as religious character, honest, tolerance, democratic, spirit of nationality, love the homeland, love peace with teaching materials in the form of validated model books validation, practicality and effectiveness.

Keywords

learning history, character

References

  1. Ahmadi, Abu & Soleh, Munawar. (2005). Psikologi Perkembangan. Jakarta Rineka Cipta.
  2. Aman. (2014). Aktualisassi Nilai-Nilai Kesadaran Sejarah dan Nasionalisme dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah di SMA, Jurnal : Pendidikan Karakter, Tahun IV. Nomor 1 Pebruari 2014.
  3. Anesta, Eki Dian. (2012). Proses Pengintegrasian Nilai-Nilai Pendidikan Karakter Bangsa dalam Pembelajaran PKn pada Siswa SMP Negeri 8 Malang, Program Stdudi Perndidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan, Jurusan Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan. FIS, Universitas Negeri Malang.
  4. Creswell, John W. (2003). Research Design QualUative, Quanfiiafive And Mixed Method. London: Sage Publshing.
  5. Durkheim, Emil. (1961). Pendidikan Moral, Suatu Studi Teori dan Aplikasi Sosiologi Pendidikan. (terj) Jakarta: Erlangga
  6. Davis, Gray A & Margaret A. (1989). Sekolah Efektif dan Guru Efektif. Saduran Salfen Hasri. Makassar:Yayasan Pendidikan Makassar
  7. Elmubarok, Zaim. (2008). Membumikan Pendidikan Nilai. Bandung: Alfabeta
  8. Fathurochman, Pupuh. (1992). Keteladanan Pemimpin, Analisisi Psikologis, Kompas 15 September 1992.
  9. Hasan Al’Aridei, Ali. (2012). Sejarah dan Metodologi Tafsir, Jakarta : Rajawali.
  10. Hamalik, Oemar. (2011). Kurikudum dan Pembelejaran. Jakarta: Bumi Akasara
  11. Jalaluddin dan Abdullah Idi. (1997). Filsafat Pendidikan, Manusia, Filsafat dan Pendidikan. Jakarta: Gaya Medai Pratama.
  12. Kuntowijoyo. (2006). Penjelasan Sejarah (Historical Explanation), Yogyakarta: Tiara Wacana.
  13. Lichona, Thomas. (2012) : Character Matters : How to Help Our Children DevelopGood Judgment, Inteligenty and Ofther Essential Virtues, Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  14. Luthifiah. (2007). Urgensi Pendidikan dalam Budaya Politik, Jurnal Pendidikan Alternatif Pendidikan Insani, Vol. 12 No. 3 Sep-Des 2007/312-328 P3M STAIN Purwekerto.
  15. Masyhar. (2011). Keteladanan Modal Utama Pemimpin, Artikel dalam Website Resmi Ormas MKGR

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018121