The Relationship of Religiosity and Peer Conformity with Students’ Attitude toward Prosocial Behavior

Nur Hafiza(1*), Neviyarni Neviyarni(2), Yarmis Syukur(3)
  • (1) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (3) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The depletion of students’ prosocial behavior is one of the problems associated with how students’ religiosity level and how students conform to behavior of peers. The aims of this study were to reveal the relationship between religiosity, peer conformity with students’ attitude toward prosocial behavior. The method used was quantitative, descriptive correlational type. The population was 332 students and 62 students were taken as the sample by using proportional stratified random sampling technique. The instruments are religiosity scale (17 valid items, α=0,806), peer conformity scale (15 valid items, α=0, 732) and students’ attitude toward prosocial behavior scale (53 valid items, α=0,944). The data were analyzed by multiple regression. The result showed a correlation coefficient R = 0,638 and p = 0,000 (p < 0,05). That result indicated there is a positif and significant relationship between religiosity and peer conformity with students’ attitude toward prosocial behavior. The implication of this study could be used as need assessment to guidance and counseling services.

Keywords

religiosity, peer conformity, students’ attitude, prosocial behavior

References

  1. Abdullah, A. & Handayani, S. W. R. I. (2015). Hubungan Konformitas dan Perilaku Prosoial pada Pedagang Kaki Lima Pasar Besar Malang. Jurnal Psikovidya, 19(1), 2502-6925.
  2. Ahmed, A. M. (2009). Are Religious People More Prosocial? A Quasi-Experimental Study with Madrasah Pupils in a Rural Community in India. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 48(2), 368-374.
  3. Andelia, B. & Noor, H. (tanpa tahun). Hubungan Religiusitas dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Relawan Korsa (Korps Relawan Salman ITB). Jurnal Prosiding Psikologi, ISSN: 2460-6448.
  4. Ayudhia, R. R. & Kristiana, I. F. (2016). Hubungan antara Hardiness dengan Perilaku Prososial pada Siswa Kelas XI SMA Islam Hidayatullah Semarang. Jurnal Empati, 5(2), 205-210.
  5. Azwar, S. (2011). Sikap Manusia: Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  6. Bradley, S. C., Giletta, M., Cohen, G. L., dan Prinstein, M. J. (2015). Peer Influence, Peer Status, and Prosocial Behavior: An Experimental Investigation of Peer Socialization of Adolescents’ Intentions to Volunteer. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 22(12), 2197-2210.
  7. Daniprawiro, M. (2009). Menipisnya Budaya Tradisional. Gemari Edisi 96/Tahun IX/Januari 2009, 78-79.
  8. Dayakisni, T. & Hudaniah. (2003). Psikologi Sosial. Malang: UMM Press.
  9. Desmita. (2009). Psikologi Perkembangan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
  10. Eisenberg, N. & Mussen, P. H. (2003). The Roots of Prosocial Behavior in Children. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Eisenberg, N., Carlo, G., Murphy, B., & Court, P. (1995). Prosocial Development in Late Adolescence: A Longitudinal Study. Child Development, 66, 1179-1197.
  12. Gommans, R., Sandstrom, M. J., Stevens, G. W. J. M., Bogt, T. F. M., & Cillessen, A. H. N. (2017). Popularity, Likeability, and Peer Conformity: Four Field Experiments. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 73, 279-289.
  13. Haryati, T. D. (2013). Kematangan Emosi, Religiusitas, dan Perilaku Prososial Perawat di Rumah Sakit. Jurnal Psikologi Indonesia, 2(2), 162-172.
  14. Lestari, K. A. & Fauziah, N. (2016). Hubungan antara Konformitas dengan Motivasi Belajar pada Siswa di SMA Muhammadiyah Kudus. Jurnal Empati, 5(4), 717-720.
  15. Pismawenzi, Jamaldi, & Andini, D. S. (2015). Hubungan Religiusitas dengan Ketahanan Mental. Laporan Penelitian. Padang: Lembaga Penelitian dan Penerbitan IAIN Imam Bonjol.
  16. Santrock, J.W.. (2012). Life Span Development: Perkembangan Masa Hidup Jilid 1 Edisi ke-13 (Benedictine Widyasinta & Novietha I. Sallama, Penerjemah.). Jakarta : Erlangga.
  17. Saroglou, V. (2006). Religion’s Role in Prosocial Behavior: Myth or Reality?. Psychology of Religion Newsletter-AP Division 36, 31(2), 1-16.
  18. Saroglou, V., Pichon, I., Trompette, L., Verschueren, M., & Dernelle, R. (2005). Prosocial Behavioi and Religion: New Evidance Based on Projective Measures and Peer Ratings. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 44, 323-348.
  19. Sears, D. O., Peplau, L. A., & Taylor, S. E. (2009). Psikologi Sosial Edisi Kedua Belas (Wibowo, Penerjemah.). Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
  20. Stamatoulakis, K. K. (2013). Religiosity and Prosociality. Procedia, Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 830-834.
  21. Zhixu, Y., Xinyuan, F., Xiaoxia, Y., & Yichen, L. (2017). Longitudinal relations between adolescents’ materialisme and prosocial behavior toward family, friends, and strangers. Journal of Adolescence, 62, 162-170.

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018138

International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology

International Conferences on Educational, Social Sciences and Technology

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP

978-989-758-296-7

978-602-73537-9-4

April 2018

  View Articles

© 2024 GCI, Global Conferences Index, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.