Ideology in public comments towards news about Jakarta election in social media

Abstract

The 2017 of Jakarta Election is not only enlivened by the comments of politicians and experts , but also followed by the general public in a critical, obscene, and massive way. This study aimed to reveal the ideology in public opinions about the discourse of Jakarta election at social media. This research used qualitative-descriptive approach with content analysis method, and based on the critical discourse analysis theory by Norman Fairclough. The result of the research showed (1) about 57.4% of public opinions represent ideology of Islamic religion by raising the issue of the importance of Aqeedah, Sharia, and morals for leaders, through vocabularies like the similar faith, fellow moeslems, humane, and dirt, (2) a number of 34.8% show the ideology of secularism with the issue of electing the government leaders not a religious leader through the use of vocabularies such as performance, don’t, clean, not corrupt; while (3) just 7.8% represent the ideology of liberalism with the issue such as no offense for the public to choose their leader through the use of vocabularies such as freedom, logical thinking, realistic, and common sense.

Keywords

ideology, public comments, discourse of election

References

  1. Abdulsyani. (2012). Sosiologi skematika, teori dan terapan. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  2. Ahmadi, H dan Asi, E. S. (2013). Editorials and ideologies. International Journal of Culture Sains dan Olahraga, 1 (4).
  3. Ali, M. K & Nordin, M. Z. F. (2016). Linguistic legitimation of political events in newspaper discourse Advances in Language and Literary Studies, 7 (4).
  4. Altwajri, A.O. (1997). Islam, barat, dan kebebasan akademis. Yogyakarta: Titian Ilahi Press.
  5. Asghar, J. (2014). Language power and ideology in commercial discourse: A prologue to critical dicourse analysis for neophyte analysts. Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies, 3 (4).
  6. Asghar, J. (2014). Words speak louder than actions: a critical analysis of ideological perspectives in media discourse. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science, 4 (5).
  7. Budiyono. (2016). Media sosial dan komunikasi politik: media sosial sebagai komunikasi politik menjelang pilkada dki jakarta 2017. (Jurnal Komunikasi). 11 (1).
  8. Bukhari, N. H.S dan Xiaoyang, W. (2013). Critical discourse analysis and educational research. Journal of Research & Method in Education (IOSR-JRME), 3 (1).
  9. Dianastiti, F. E. dan Mardikantoro, H. B. (2016). Analisis wacana kritis pemberitaan harian suara merdeka, harian republika, harian kompas, dan tabloid derap guru dalam pembentukan citra guru. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Seloka 5 (2).
  10. Faghih, E & Moghiti, R (2017). Persian renderings of english conceptual discourse patterns: a case study of animal farm. International Journal of Comparative Literature & Translation. Volume 5 (3).
  11. Fairclough, N. (2003). Language and power relasi bahasa, kekuasaan, dan ideologi. Malang: Boyan Publishing.
  12. Faris, A.A dan Paramasivam, S. (2016). Ideologies in mandela’s no easy walk to freedom. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5 (5).
  13. Hurd, E. S. (2204). The political authority of secularism in international relations. European Journal of International Relation, 10 (2).
  14. Miles, M.B dan Huberman, A.M. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif. Terj. Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi. Jakarta: University Indonesia Perss.
  15. Mohammadi, M dan Javadi, J. (2017). A critical discourse analysis of donald trump’s language usein us presidential campaign, 2016. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 6 (5).
  16. Rahimi, F dan Riasati, M.J. (2011). Critical discourse analysis: scrutinizing ideologically-driven discourse. International journal of Humanities and Social Science, 1 (16).
  17. Ramanathan, R dan Hoon, T.B. (2016). Application of critical discourse analysis in media discourse studies. The Southeast Asian Journal of English Language Studies, 21 (2).
  18. Sideeg, A. I. A. (2015). Traces of ideology in translating the qurān into english: a critical discourse analysis of six cases across twenty versions. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 4 (5).
  19. Shahsavar, Z. & Naderi, M. S. H (2015). Investigating the influence of ideology on translation: a critical discourse analysis of “ATale of Two Cities” and its Persian Translations. International Journal of English Language Translation Studies. Published on: 07/03/2015.
  20. Sugiyono. (2010). Metode penelitian pendidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  21. Suryono, Y. (2009). Politik ideologi pendidikan. Yogyakarta: LaksBang Mediatama.
  22. Susanto, A. (2013). Filsafat ilmu suatu kajian dalam dimensi ontologis, epistimologis,dan aksiologis. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  23. Syam, F. (2010). Pemikiran politik barat: Sejarah, filsafat, ideologi, dan pengaruhnya tehadap dunia ke-3. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
  24. Usfinit, Y, Suprojo, A, & Setyawan, D. (2014). Perspektif partisipasi politik masyarakat pada pemilihan kepala daerah (pilkada) kota Malang. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik,3 (1).
  25. Vahid, H. (2012). The power behind images: advertisement discourse in focus. International Journal of Linguistics, 4 (4).
  26. Widyawari, C. P. G dan Zulaeha, I. (2016). Representasi ideologi dalam tuturan santun para pejabat negara pada talk show mata najwa. Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa dan Sastra Indonesia Seloka 5 (1).
  27. Zarkasyi, H. F. (2011). Liberalisasi pemikiran islam: gerakan bersama missionaris, orientalis, dan kolonialis. Jurnal Tsaqafah, 5 (1).

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018149