Validity of LKPD based constructivism approachment


Problem solving ability is one of the mathematical abilities that are important in the success of students. But the fact remains low problem solving ability. One approach that can develop problem solving ability is constructivism approachment. The constructivism approach is one of the learning approaches which can trigger students to build their own knowledge and help students find their own mathematical principles or procedures. LKPD is one important component in learning. LKPD used by teachers not specifically describe the learning process, as well as yet to be seen developing students' problem solving abilities. This study aims to determine the validity of LKPD based on constructivism approach. This research is a development research by using Plomp model which consists of preliminary research, development stage and assessment phase. The results of data analysis show that the developed LKPD has been valid with the validity index of 0,848 so it can be used to increase problem solving student ability.


constructivism approachment, LKPD, validity, plomp.


  1. Barmby, P. et al. (2007). How Can We Assess Mathematical Understanding?.In Woo, J. H., Lew, H. C., Park, K. S. & Seo, D. Y. (Eds.). Proceedings of the 31st Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Vol. 2, pp. 41-48. Seoul: PME.
  2. Bodner, G.M. (1986). Constructivism: A Theory of Knowledge. Journal of Chemical Education. 63, 873-878.
  3. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia Edisi ke 4 Pusat Bahasa. (2008). Departemen Pendidikan Nasional. Jakarta: PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
  4. Kemdikbud. (2016). Buku Guru Matematika SMP/MTs Kelas VII. Jakarta: Kemeterian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
  5. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics (NCTM). (2000). Principles and Standards for school Mathematics, Restron, VA: NCTM.
  6. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Nomor 58 Tahun 2014 tentang Kurikulum SMP. (2013). Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
  7. Plomp, Tjeerd. (2013). An Introduction to Educational Design Research :SLO – Netherlands Institute for Curriculum Development.
  8. Sagala, Syaiful. 2011. Kemampuan Profesional Guru dan Tenaga Kependidikan. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  9. Sri Wardhani dan Rumiati. (2011). Modul Matematika SMP Program Bermutu:
  10. Instrumen Penilaian Hasil Belajar Matematika SMP Belajar dari dari
  11. PISA dan TIMSS. Yogyakarta: PPPPTK Matematika. (diakses 20 Agustus 2016 dari
  12. Suherman, Erman, dkk. (2003). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: Fakultas Pendidikan MIPA Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.