The correlation between self regulated and learning achievement of underachiever students

Abstract

This research is conducted based on the fact that underachiever students are still found in the field students whose intelligence is high but their learning outcomes are below standard. Self regulated is assumed as a factor exerting an influence upon underachiever students’ learning achievement. The aim of this research is to see the correlation between self regulated and learning achievement of the underachievers. This research is classified into quantitative study which was conducted by applying correlational method. The subjects of the research were 87 students. The instruments used is self regulated instruments by applying scale of Likert model. The data obtained were analyzed by using simple regression. The results of the research indicate that there is a positive and significant correlation between self regulated and learning achievement of the underachievers.

Keywords

self regulated, learning achievement, underachiever students

References

AR, N. A. N. (2015). Psikologi belajar. Al-Fikrah: Jurnal Kependidikan Islam, 6.

Atiyah, S. (2011). Upaya Konselor dalam Mengatasi Siswa Underachiever Di Sma An-Najiyah Surabaya(Doctoral dissertation, UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya).

Chen, S.C. (2002). Self regulated learning strategies and achievement in an introduction to information system course. JournalSpring Vol. 20, No. 1.

Ford, Donna. Y. & Thomas, A. (1997). Underachievement Among Gifted Minority Students : Problems and Promises. ERIC Digest E544.

Francis, N.P. (2011). Tinjauanteoritis: Self RegulationpadaMahasiswaUnderachiever. Humaniora.Vol.2, No.1.

Ghufron, M.N &Risnawita R. (2010). Teori-teori Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Ar Ruzz Media.

Gredler, M. E. (2011). Learning and Instruction Teori dan Aplikasi (Edisi Keenam). Terjemahan oleh Tri Wibowo, B. S. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Hamdu, G., & Agustina, L. (2011). Pengaruh Motivasi Belajar Siswa Terhadap Prestasi Belajar IPA di Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan, 12(1), 90-96.

Khodijah, N.(2014). Psikologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Maulana, Z. (2012). Meningkatkan Kemandirian Belajar Melalui Layanan Informasi pada Siswa Kelas XI IPS SMA 1 Tolangogula Kabupaten Gorontalo.Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan PEDAGOGIKA, Vol. 3, No. (3), Hal. 1-17.

McCaslin, M., & Hickey, D.T. (2001). Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: A Vygotskian view. In B. J. Zimmerman & D. H. Schunk (Eds.), Self-regulated learning and academic achievement: Theoretical perspectives (pp. 227-252). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

McCoach dan Siegle. (2003). Factors that Differentiate Underachieving Gifted Students from High Achieving Gifted Students. Jurnal Gifted Child Quarterly, Spring 2003 Vol. 47, No. 2.

Munandar, U. (2009). Pengembangan Kreativitas Anak Berbakat.Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Permendiknas Republik Indonesia Nomor 114 Tahun 2014 Tentang BimbingandanKonselingpadaPendidikanDasardanMenengah.2014. Jakarta: MenteriPendidikandanKebudayaanNasional.

Pratama, B. D., & Suharni, S. (2017). Layanan Bimbingan dan Konseling dalam Mengatasi Siswa Underachiever. Counsellia: Jurnal Bimbingan dan Konseling, 7(1), 1-10.

Prayitno dan Erman, A. (2013). Dasar-dasar Bimbingan dan Konseling. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Quince, B. C. R. (2013). The Effects of Self Regulated Learning Strategy Instruction and Structured Diary use on Students Self Regulated Learning Conduct and Academic Success in Online Comunity College General Education Courses. Disertasi (Online). University of San Francisco.

Rahmawati, R. (2013). BimbingandanKonselinguntukAnakUnderachiever.Paradigma., 7 (14)

Reis, S. M. (2000). The Underachievement of Gifted Students: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go?.Jurnal Gifted Child Quarterly, Summer 2000 Vol. 44, No. 3, Hal.72-83.

Saefullah. (2012). Psikologi Perkembangandan Pendidikan.Bandung:Pustaka Setia.

Sahrul, T. (2004).ProfilSiswaUnderachieverdanLayananPembelajaranolehPembimbing di SMAN 2 Padang.Tesis. PPS UNP.

Santrock, J. W. (2010).Psikologi Pendidikan. Terjemahan oleh Tri Wibowo. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Sari, D.P. (2015).EfektivitasLayananBimbinganKelompokuntukMeningkatkanSelf RegulationSiswadalamBelajar.Tesis. Padang: Program Studi S2 BimbingandanKonseling UNP Padang

Shidiq, A. D. N., dan Mujidin. (2009). Perbedaan Self Regulated Learning antara Siswa Underachievers dan Siswa Overachievers pada Kelas 3 SMPN 6 Yogyakarta.Jurnal Psikologi, Vol. 29. No. 1.

Sofiyanita.(2003). KondisiSiswaUnderachieverdanLayananPembelajaranoleh Guru Pembimbing di SMUN 1 Bukittinggi.Tesis. Padang: PPs UNP Padang.

Surya.M. (1979). Pengaruh Faktor-faktor Non-intelektual terhadap Gejala Berprestasi Kurang. Disertasi.IKIP Bandung.

Widyastuti, R. ( 2010). Hubungan Motivasi Belajar dan Hasil Tes Inteligensi dengan Prestasi Belajar. Tesis (Online). Program Pascasarjana Universitas Sebelas Maret Surakarta.

Wilson, M. L. (2011). Students Learning Style Preferences and Teachers InstructionalStrategies: Correlations between matchedStyles and academic achievement. Disertasi (Online). Liberty University Lynchburg.

Winne, P. H., dan Hadwin, A. F. (2010). Learning and Cognition: Theoretical perspectives learning. Canada: Elsevier ltd.

Winkel W.S. (1997). PsikologiPendidikandanEvaluasiBelajar. Jakarta: Gramedia.

Zimmerman, B. J., dan Schunk, D. H. (2011). Hanbook Self Regulation of Learning and Performance. New York dan London: Routledge Taylor dan Francis Group

DOI : https://doi.org/10.29210/2018114