School institution services in human rights perspective

Akmal(1*), Atika Ulya A(2)
  • (1) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (2) Universitas Negeri Padang
  • (*) Corresponding Author

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the services of school institutions in the perspective of Human Rights. Factors that affect the service are: (1) creating leadership that performs basic tasks and functions (Tupoksi) with human rights or ASN (State Civil Apparatus) that is not working professionally (Abuse of Power) or lack of human resources, (2) negligence or omission, Violation by Ommision, and (3) incorrect institutional policy factors violating the regulation (Violation by commmision) of public services by school institutions. The research method used a quantitative approach. Location of State Senior High School of Padang with 16 principals and 400 educators and educational staff as population and 46 samples who become respondents. Data were collected through questionnaires that have been validated and processed through Path-Analysis techniques. The results of the study prove that all variables, namely two independent variables and one moderator variable studied showed significant relationship and influence on the dependent variable. Thus the hypothetical model that has been proven can be used as a model of the school institution service that has human rights perspective, can improve the performance of educators and education personnel on services provided by the school. The results of this study indicate that professional services, not neglect, and humane policies can be used as models of institutional services in the context of different school cultural values spatially, so have the reliability of the model. Besides, this model can also be used as a guideline for the implementation of basic tasks and functions of school institutions that have human rights in Indonesia.

Keywords

services, school institutions, Human Rights

References

  1. Cropanzano, R. S, & Greenberg ,J. (1997). Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling through the Maze. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Volume 12
  2. Cropan zano, R. S, & Kacmar, K. M., & Bozeman, D. P. (1995). Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work. Westport, CT, Quorum Books.
  3. DuBrin A. J,. (1990). Winning Office Politic, New Jersey: Prentice Hall
  4. Dwiyan to, A, at. all. (2006). Reformasi birokrasi publik di indonesia,Yogyakarta: PSKK UGM
  5. Freddy Rangkuti (2013). Customer Service Satisfaction, Jakarta: Gramedia
  6. Froehle, C, M,. (2006). Service Personnel, Technology, and Their Interaction in Influencing Customer Satisfaction, Decision Sciences, volume 37 Number 1, February 2006, Jounal Compilation © 2006, Decision Sciences Institute
  7. George, K,. (1999). A two-way Street: Institutional Dynamic of Modern Administrative Statet. Pittsburgh, PA: University Pittsburgh Press
  8. Komna HAM Perwakilan Sumatera Barat (2006-2010).Birokrasi Sipil (Pemda) dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Studi Pada Pemda Sumatera Barat.
  9. Kurniawan, J, L & Puspitosari, H,. (2007). Wajah Buram Pelayanan Publik, Jakarta, Malang Corruption Watch dan YAPPIKA
  10. Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: designing effective organizations, New Jersey USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  11. Mintzberg, H. (1980). Power in and around organization, New Jersey USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  12. Mintzberg, H. (1989). Management Natures, New Jersey USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  13. Mulyasa. 2005. Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. Bandung : Rosda Karya
  14. Napitupulu, P,. (2007). Pelayanan Publik dan Customer Satisfaction, Bandung, Alumni
  15. Ndraha, T,. (2005) Kybernologi; beberapa konstruksi utama, Tangerang Banten: Sirao Credentia Center
  16. Pusham UNP,( 2010). Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Praktik Pelayanan Publik. Hasil Kajian Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. UNP:Padang
  17. Ratminto dan Winarsih, A, S,. (2008). Manajemen pelayanan; Pengembangan Model Konseptual, Penerapan Citizen’s Chartet dan Standar Pelayanan Minimal, Jogjakarta, Pustaka Pelajar
  18. Sairin, Syafri. 2003. Membangun Profesionalisme Muhammadiyah, (Yogyakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Tenaga Profesi) hal 37.
  19. Subarsono, AG. (2006). Pelayanan Publik yang Efisien, dan Non-partisan. Dalam Agus wiyanto (editor). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyaart: UGM Press.
  20. Thomson, W & MORI,. (2004) Costumer Satisfaction with Key Public Services, www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/opsr
  21. Wan Usman (2008). Pembangunan Berwawasan Ketahanan Nasional. Program Studi Pengkajian Ketahanan Nasional Pascasarjana UI: Jakarta
  22. Wasi stiono, Sadu,. (2003). Kapita Selekta Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah. Bandung: Fokusmedia
  23. Vigoda-Gadot, E,. (2006). Citizens’ Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations, Journal of Public Administrasion Research and Theory, Volume 17, Oxford University Press
  24. Yusof, A, A,.(2001). Politik Organisasi dalam Penilaian Prestasi (Realiti atau persepsi), Sintok, Universiti Utara Malaysia
  25. Sekretariat Daerah Padang, (2015). Padang Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Padang 2015
  26. UU No.39 Tahun 1999. Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia
  27. UU No. 12 Tahun 2005. Konvensi Internasional Tentang Hak Ekonomi Sosial Budaya

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/24274

International Conference on Education, Islamic Studies and Social Sciences Research

International Conference on Education, Islamic Studies and Social Sciences Research

Fakultas Ilmu Pendidikan UNP

978-989-758-296-0

978-602-50676-0-1

November 2018

  View Articles

© 2024 GCI, Global Conferences Index, Lda - All rights reserved.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.