School institution services in human rights perspective

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the services of school institutions in the perspective of Human Rights. Factors that affect the service are: (1) creating leadership that performs basic tasks and functions (Tupoksi) with human rights or ASN (State Civil Apparatus) that is not working professionally (Abuse of Power) or lack of human resources, (2) negligence or omission, Violation by Ommision, and (3) incorrect institutional policy factors violating the regulation (Violation by commmision) of public services by school institutions. The research method used a quantitative approach. Location of State Senior High School of Padang with 16 principals and 400 educators and educational staff as population and 46 samples who become respondents. Data were collected through questionnaires that have been validated and processed through Path-Analysis techniques. The results of the study prove that all variables, namely two independent variables and one moderator variable studied showed significant relationship and influence on the dependent variable. Thus the hypothetical model that has been proven can be used as a model of the school institution service that has human rights perspective, can improve the performance of educators and education personnel on services provided by the school. The results of this study indicate that professional services, not neglect, and humane policies can be used as models of institutional services in the context of different school cultural values spatially, so have the reliability of the model. Besides, this model can also be used as a guideline for the implementation of basic tasks and functions of school institutions that have human rights in Indonesia.

Keywords

services, school institutions, Human Rights

References

Cropanzano, R. S, & Greenberg ,J. (1997). Progress in Organizational Justice: Tunneling through the Maze. International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology. Volume 12

Cropan zano, R. S, & Kacmar, K. M., & Bozeman, D. P. (1995). Organizational Politics, Justice and Support: Managing Social Climate at Work. Westport, CT, Quorum Books.

DuBrin A. J,. (1990). Winning Office Politic, New Jersey: Prentice Hall

Dwiyan to, A, at. all. (2006). Reformasi birokrasi publik di indonesia,Yogyakarta: PSKK UGM

Freddy Rangkuti (2013). Customer Service Satisfaction, Jakarta: Gramedia

Froehle, C, M,. (2006). Service Personnel, Technology, and Their Interaction in Influencing Customer Satisfaction, Decision Sciences, volume 37 Number 1, February 2006, Jounal Compilation © 2006, Decision Sciences Institute

George, K,. (1999). A two-way Street: Institutional Dynamic of Modern Administrative Statet. Pittsburgh, PA: University Pittsburgh Press

Komna HAM Perwakilan Sumatera Barat (2006-2010).Birokrasi Sipil (Pemda) dan Hak Asasi Manusia. Studi Pada Pemda Sumatera Barat.

Kurniawan, J, L & Puspitosari, H,. (2007). Wajah Buram Pelayanan Publik, Jakarta, Malang Corruption Watch dan YAPPIKA

Mintzberg, H. (1983). Structure in fives: designing effective organizations, New Jersey USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mintzberg, H. (1980). Power in and around organization, New Jersey USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mintzberg, H. (1989). Management Natures, New Jersey USA: Prentice-Hall, Inc.

Mulyasa. 2005. Menjadi Kepala Sekolah Profesional. Bandung : Rosda Karya

Napitupulu, P,. (2007). Pelayanan Publik dan Customer Satisfaction, Bandung, Alumni

Ndraha, T,. (2005) Kybernologi; beberapa konstruksi utama, Tangerang Banten: Sirao Credentia Center

Pusham UNP,( 2010). Aparatur Pemerintah Daerah Dalam Praktik Pelayanan Publik. Hasil Kajian Pelaksanaan Otonomi Daerah. UNP:Padang

Ratminto dan Winarsih, A, S,. (2008). Manajemen pelayanan; Pengembangan Model Konseptual, Penerapan Citizen’s Chartet dan Standar Pelayanan Minimal, Jogjakarta, Pustaka Pelajar

Sairin, Syafri. 2003. Membangun Profesionalisme Muhammadiyah, (Yogyakarta: Lembaga Pengembangan Tenaga Profesi) hal 37.

Subarsono, AG. (2006). Pelayanan Publik yang Efisien, dan Non-partisan. Dalam Agus wiyanto (editor). Mewujudkan Good Governance Melalui Pelayanan Publik. Yogyaart: UGM Press.

Thomson, W & MORI,. (2004) Costumer Satisfaction with Key Public Services, www.cabinetoffice.gov.uk/opsr

Wan Usman (2008). Pembangunan Berwawasan Ketahanan Nasional. Program Studi Pengkajian Ketahanan Nasional Pascasarjana UI: Jakarta

Wasi stiono, Sadu,. (2003). Kapita Selekta Manajemen Pemerintahan Daerah. Bandung: Fokusmedia

Vigoda-Gadot, E,. (2006). Citizens’ Perceptions of Politics and Ethics in Public Administration: A Five-Year National Study of Their Relationship to Satisfaction with Services, Trust in Governance, and Voice Orientations, Journal of Public Administrasion Research and Theory, Volume 17, Oxford University Press

Yusof, A, A,.(2001). Politik Organisasi dalam Penilaian Prestasi (Realiti atau persepsi), Sintok, Universiti Utara Malaysia

Sekretariat Daerah Padang, (2015). Padang Dalam Angka. Badan Pusat Statistik Padang 2015

UU No.39 Tahun 1999. Tentang Hak Asasi Manusia

UU No. 12 Tahun 2005. Konvensi Internasional Tentang Hak Ekonomi Sosial Budaya

DOI : https://doi.org/10.32698/24274