This study aims to present a concept on the evaluation results of theoretical studies in guidance and counseling in schools.. Explain the concept of the meaning of the measurement, assessment and evaluation of the meaning. The study starts from the evaluation of the importance of the guidance and counselling services, both as a program or as an activity services. Guidance and counselling services as an integral part of the educational services, should be evaluated. Because it will be used as the main considerations to determine the urgency of guidance and counselling services in schools, especially the urgency on academic and non-academic achievement. The measured judgment is something that is absolutely used. Focus the discussion on how to assess the performance of the guidance and counselling teachers or school counsellors in carrying out four types of services, namely: guidance service of classical, guidance service groups, counseling services group and individual counselling service. Results of the study offers an instrument containing signs abilities and skills guidance counseling teacher or school counselor who must be controlled so that it can be used to assess performance. The fourth assessment skills are also very important for prospective teachers of guidance and counseling.
assessment of classical services, counselors, guidance counseling, individual counseling group.
Azwar, Saifuddin. (2003). Penyusunan Skala Psikologi. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Bloom, Benjamin S. et.all., (1996). Taxonomy of Educational Objectives: The Classification of
Education Goals, Handbook 1, Cognitif Domain. New York: David Mc Kay Co.,Inc.
Boulmetis, J., & Dutwin, P. (2000). The ABCs of evaluation: Timeless techniques for program and project managers. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Cronbach, Lee J. (1984). Essentials of Psychological Testing. New York: Harper and Row
Djaali, Puji Mulyono dan Ramly. (2000). Pengukuran Dalam Bidang Pendidikan. Jakarta: PPs
Universitas Negeri Jakarta.
Gysbers, N.C. & Henderson, P. (2004). Comprehensive Guidance and Counseling Program
Evaluation: Program + Personnel = Results.
Gysbers, N. C., & Henderson, P. (2006). Developing and managing your school counseling program
(4 ed.). Alexandria, VA: American Counseling Association.
Gregory, Robert J. (2004). Psychological testing: History, principles, and applications. Fourth
Edition. Boston: Pearson Education Group, Inc.
Kaufman, R., & Keller, J. M. (1994). Levels of evaluation: Beyond Kirkpatrick. Human
Resource Development Quarterly, 5, 371-380.
Kementerian Pendidikan Nasional (2010). Peraturan Bersama Menteri Pendidikan Nasional dan Kepala Badan Kepegawaian Negara Nomor:03/V/PB/2010 Nomor : 14 tahun
2010 tentang Petunjuk Pelaksanaan Jabatan Fungsional Guru dan Angka Kreditnya. Jakarta:
Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan (2014). Modul Diklat Implementasi Kurikulum 2013 untuk Guru BK/Konselor SMP/MTs.
Mungin Eddy Wibowo (2005). Konseling Kelompok Perkembangan. Semarang: UNNES Press. Nitho, Anthony J. (1996). Educational Assessment of Students. Englewood Cliffs. New Jersey:
Prayitno (2013), Konseling Integritas, Padang : UNP
Popham, W. J. (1995). Classroom Assesment: What teachers need to know. Boston: Allyn and
Stufflebeam, D.L & Anthony J.Shinkfield: (2007). Evaluation Theory, Models & Applications.
John Wiley & Sons, Inc. San Francisco.
Sanders, J.R., & Sullins, C.D. (2006) Evaluating school programs. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
Stake, R. E. (2004). Standards-based and responsive evaluation. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
William, W. & Stephan, G.J. (1990). Educational Measurrement and Testing. Second
Edition. USA: The University of Teledo Alyn and Bacon.
DOI : https://doi.org//213