Application of modeling service to improve student discipline of SMK kesehatan PGRI Magetan

Abstract

An increasingly evolving world of education demands students to be intelligent and courteous. In order to form students who are smart and polite require good education. Modeling services are good exemplary services ranging from the most basic things that school counselors provide to learners. In this study the authors used descriptive qualitative research and using the type of phenomenological research. The data obtained from observation, interview, and documentation. The results showed that modeling services give a dominant impact in learning morals students. In the modeling learning done by the schools through the teaching staff are done in different ways by modeling the participants, and facilitating their students in doing this service. Modeling service is very influential for the development of student behavior, proven students experience a very significant change. Various characters of students who come from various circles, can be changed through the modeling services done school. In addition, the influence of counselor characteristics in modeling is also very influential in the success of service modeling. It can be concluded that modeling services by schools through well-characterized teaching staff can have a positive impact on their students. Can be proved from the progress of students who experience a gradual change in attitude.

Keywords

Counselor Profile, Layout Modeling and Discipline

References

  1. Ali, Muhammad. 1997. penelitian pendidikan prosedur dan strategi, bandung: Angkasa.
  2. Ali, Muhammad. 2006. Kamus Besar Bahasa Indonesia. Jakarta : Pustaka Amani.
  3. Arikunto, Suharsimi. 1993. Prosedur Penelitian Suatu Pendekatan Praktis. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.
  4. Azwar, Saifudin. 2004. metode Penelitian, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  5. Alwisol. 2009. Psikologi Kepribadian, Tlogomas Malang: UMM Press.
  6. Boeree, George. 2006. Personality Theorie, Jogyakarta : Prisma sophie
  7. Dwi, Sulistyo. 2011. Pertumbuhan dan Perkembangan Anak dan Remaja, Jakarta: Trans info Media.
  8. Faishal, Sanafiah. 1995. Format-Format Penelitian Sosial. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  9. Hadari, nawawi. 1996. Penelitian terapan Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Pres
  10. Herdiansyah, Aris. 2012. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif untuk ILmu-ilmu Sosial, Jakarta: Salemba Humanika.
  11. Idrus, Muhammad. 2009. Metode Penelitian Ilmu Sosial, Jakarta: Erlangga.
  12. Kasiram, Moh. 2008. Metodologi Penelitian, Malang: UIN-MALIKI Press.
  13. Lexy, Moloeng. 2001. metode penelitian kualitatif, Bandung: rosda karya.
  14. Lumongga, Namora. 2011. Memahami dasar-dasar konseling dalam teori dan praktik, Jakarta: Kencana.
  15. Mappiare, Andi. 2006. Pengantar Konseling dan Psikoterapi , Jakarta: PT raja Grafindo Persada.
  16. Mc Leod, John. 2010. Pengantar konseling teori dan studi kasus, Jakarta: Kencana Predan Media Group.
  17. Muhajir, Noeng. 1998. Metodologi Kualitatif. Yogjakarta: Rakesrasin.
  18. Narbuko, Cholid dan Ahmadi. 1997. Metodologi Penelitian. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  19. Nawawi, Hadari. 1996. Penelitian terapan. Yogyakarta: Gajahmada University Press.
  20. Nelson-Jones, Richard. 2012. Pengantar Keterampilan Konseling, Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
  21. Retno, tri hariastuti.2007, Keterampilan-Keterampilan Dasar Dalam Konseling, Surabaya:Unesa University Press.
  22. Sholahudin, Anas. 2010, Bimbingan dan Konseling, Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia.
  23. Sudjana, Nanag dan Ibrahim. 1995. Penelitian dan Penilaian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rajawali Press.
  24. Sugiyono. 2009. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif dan Kuantitatif. Bandung: Alfabeta.
  25. Sukardi. 2003. Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
  26. Sutrisno, Hadi. 1991. Metodologi Reseach. Yogyakarta: PP UGM.
  27. S. Margono. 1997. Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Jakarta: Rieneka Cipta.
  28. Partanto, Pius A. 1994. Kamus Ilmiah Populer. Surabaya: arloka.

DOI : https://doi.org//180